Weird LDS Censorship

LDS Church leaders have decided to stay in the censorship business.  This time over the papers of the late Leonard Arrington, noted historian.  My church just can’t seem to leave Arrington alone, even after death.  Ironically, he loved the Church deeply.

Quoting from the SLTrib, Kristen Moulton states:

Leonard Arrington wanted his 750-box collection of personal papers, books, speeches and research to be archived at USU, where it would be available to researchers in the Special Collections and Archives at Merrill-Cazier Library.

But within 3 years of his death in 1999, a dispute erupted over ownership of this masssive collection, which includes his 50-box diary.

The LDS Church asserted that it owned 60 percent of the collection owing to Arrington’s 8 years as church historian, starting in 1972, and 2 more as head of the faith’s history division.

Arrington’s family and USU disagreed.  After a tense month of negotiations, the church settled for half a box of documents.

The family said the handful given to the church–papers pertaining to temple ceremonies and minutes from Quorum of the Twelve Apostles meetings–had been filed mistakenly with Arrington’s personal collection.

Apparently one of concerns over the Arrington papers was embarassing revelations about LDS Church leaders:  “A now-deceased apostle used to smoke cigars earlier in his life . . .”

So what?  Do we think any less of Mother Teresa because she had doubts, or of Trappist monk Thomas Merton because he had at least an emotional affair (and maybe a physical one ) with a woman half his age.  I think not.  None of us is perfect.  Mormon leaders need to quit trying to control our history.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in mormonism. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Weird LDS Censorship

  1. rogerdhansen says:

    Another example of weird censorship is airbrushing out the wings on the angels painted by Danish artist Carl Heinrich Bloch.

    Or airbrushing out the tatoos from the photographs of BYU basketball players.

  2. buraianto says:

    So in the end the Church only retained ownership of some papers that everyone agreed they owned anyway. Is that the case?

  3. rogerdhansen says:

    I’ve not been a party to the negotiations; but I believe that is the case. Your point is?

  4. buraianto says:

    Just clarifying. I didn’t have anything else in mind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s